|
||||||
| ||||||
The Iconography of MuruganFrom Temple Cars of Medieval Tamilaham
|
Above: Mottayāndi (the shaven-headed mendicant) |
Tārakāri, Slayer of Tarakāsura |
A number of specimens (Nos. 1023 to 1036) depicting Subrahmanya as Gurumūrti (the teacher) are available. When Brahma was imprisoned, Śiva asked Muruga as to whether he knew the meaning of pranava. When the answer came positively, Śiva took it from the mouth of Muruga by placing Himself as a student. Three specimens (Nos. 1029, 1034 and 1035) show Muruga in vīrāsana. He is two handed and holds the right hand in jnāna mudrā while the other is in varada mudrā or placed on the knee of the raised leg. Śiva stands before him with the front hands folded in anjali bandha or placing a front hand on his own lips in meek obedience as a student (Nos. 1034 and 1035). In the back hands Śiva bears the antelope and chisel. Śiva is adorned with ornaments, a pitāmbara and skandhamāla. In a number of panels, (Nos. 1030 to 1035) Gurumūrti is depicted as Mottayāndi (the shaven-headed mendicant). As Mottayāndi Muruga is said do have taken the beggar's bowl in his hands, renouncing worldly life. In this condition most specimens illustrate him nude and shaven-headed wearing only a garland of kāsaya beads. Curiously enough, a specimen of the Mottayāndi type (No. 034) depicts him with the skandhamāla. In two other specimens, Gurumūrti appears as a child in the hands of Śiva (No. 1023) or a school boy (No 5025). In the latter specimens Gurumūrti is seated on a raised pedestal with the left leg in utkutika pose and the right hanging down. Rarely Parvati also stands along with Śiva. Śiva holds a long trident in the front left hand. Muruga turns his face towards the right ear of Śiva in whispering attitude.
Subrahamanya is a war-like god and so called Devasenāpati (Commander of God's forces). The very aim of Kumārasambhava was to beget a heroic son who was destined to defeat the demons. A number of panels depicting Muruga's battles with asuras (demons) called Tāraka, Sūrapadma, Gajamukhāsura and Sitishamukhāsura are forthcoming from temple cars (Nos. 1037 to 1044). As slayer of Tāraka, Muruga is called Tārakāri. In this form he bears the cock, rosary, shield, abhaya mudrā, sword and spear in his six hands He is one-faced and seated on an elephant. 214 As Krauncabhedaka, Muruga is four-armed, bearing the sugarcane bow varada mudrā abhaya mudra and the flower arrow. He is seated on a peacock. 215 In most specimens (Nos. 1037, 1040 and 1044) Devasenāpati is seated on a chariot. His chariots are either of the goratha type (Nos. 1040 and 1044) or vairatter type (No 1037), all pulled by horses. In one specimen (No. 1040) the chariot of the demon is pulled by an elephant. In his chariots Devasenāpati is found standing in ālidhāsana, bearing the arrow stringed to the bow. In a piece (No. 1041), he is depicted as cleaving the Kraunca Hill with the spear. In some specimens (Nos. 1045, 1042 and l043) he is fighting with Gajamukhāsura (the elephant faced demon) and Simhamkhāsura (the lion-faced demon).
Some of the panels deal with the romantic experiences of Muruga with Valli, leading to their marriage. The theme is very popular in Tamil folk dramas. Valli was the adopted daughter of a hunter chief, Nambi. She is considered to be the daughter of a deer and a rishi. A number of panels (Nos. 1045 to 1049) depict the episode connected with the birth of Valli. In them either a rishi is in sexual union with a deer or a deer cohabiting a girl. Two specimens (Nos. 1046 and 1047) depict the intercourse between a deer and a rishi. The deer being very short, the rishi stands contracting his body downwards so as to enable the sexual organs to meet in union. In. another piece (No. l049) a lady stands like an animal placing her two hands on the ground. A male deer pounces upon her back in the rearing attitude and is trying coitus. In this motif the rishi is represented by the deer. Other specimens depicting the union of deers (No. 1045) or a rishi lying on a cot with an animal (deer?) on his lap (No. 1048) are also available. The artist here suggests that both were human beings who had sexual relations with one or both of them transformed into the deer form. 216 Other panels portray the romantic intercourse between Valli and Muruga. In one (No. 1051) he takes the left hand of Valli as a soothsayer to read palmistry. In another (No. 1050) he is in disguise as an old man and threatens Valli to give her consent to marry while Ganapati, transformed into an elephant, is chasing her. After much romance of this kind, they get married. In this form Muruga is known as Valli Kalyanasundaram or Valliparinayamūrti. A few specimens (Nos: 1052 and 1054) depict the matrimonial scene where Brahma and Visnu are present doing the agni cārya and kannikādāna respectively.
A few other specimens depict Muruga (Nos. 1057 to 1059) as Sarvalokaksanapradakshinamūrti (the Lord who circumambulated all the worlds within a second), as a cow-boy offering jujube to Avvaiyār (No. 1050), and Mottayāndi (Nos. 1060 to 1068). As a judge, Muruga is found seated and holding a balance. He is five or six-headed and twelve armed. In a rare panel, he is seated in the centre while the Ūrdhatāndavamūrti and Kā1i stand to his left and right respectively
Muruga doing kaittālam (clapping) is a popular idiom in the Ūrdhatāndava panels of Śiva. In a rare piece (No. 1082) he is endowed with four heads, arranged in two tiers with three in first and one in second. He has twelve hands of which the front two are clapping.
In another piece (No. 1083) Muruga is endowed with three heads and twelve hands. Yet another specimen (No. 1089) depicts him with five heads and eight hands. Since the objects held in the specimens are illegible, the forms could not be identified. One among them (No. 1089) seems to be a form of Saurabheya Subrahmanya who is expected to be four faced and eight handed. 218 In two other specimens Sanmukha is seated on the peacock while the hands are arranged in circular (No. 1086) and semi-circular (No. 1084) forms. 219 In the latter specimen the heads themselves are arranged in a circular form with the result the middle face alone is visible while two other faces are partly visible.
In a remarkable specimen (No. 1087) the five-faced Kārttikeya is seated on peacock in sukhāsana pose. The hands are beautifully arranged in circular form while the front two are holding a spear horizontally, The Lord is adorned with ornaments, krita makuta, pitāmbara and skandhamāla. The standing peacock is trampling a cobra at its feet. Java and Vijaya stand on either side of the bird in dwarf form. They hold a lotus in one hand while the other is in gaja hasta.
In another panel (No. 1089) a standing figure of Sanmukha is depicted. Many of the hands in the specimen are found broken. But the figure seems to suggest that the six faced god is in a war-like posture as though holding an arrow, stringed to the bow. The heads of demons slayed by him are found scattered here and there in the panel.
In another rare piece (No. 1089), the polycephalous Sanmukha is seated in padmāsana). 220 He is endowed with twelve legs, all of which are arranged in the same seated posture. His heads are placed in three tiers with three in the first, two in the second and one in the third. The front two hands are displaying the varada and abhaya mudrās while the other hands are not visible.
Two other specimens depict Subrahmanya as seated on pedestal; in vīrāsana (No. 1090) and sukhāsana (No. 1085). Both are five faced. The former image is in the model of Daksināmurti and holds the front right hand in jnāna mudrā. The other image can be identified with Agnijāta Subrahmanya who is doing agni hotra. He is supposed to be two faced and eight handed -- the sacrifcial ladle, rosary sword, the svastika, cock, shield, thunderbolt and ājya pātra in the hands. 221 In the specimen under consideration, Muruga holds the front right hand in the attitude of pouring ghee into the agni kunda (fire pit) found in front.
Kumāra or Muruga was by origin a war-like god. So most of his iconographical forms are related to belligerent activities. Devasenāpati Tārakāri, Krauncabhedakamūrti and Arunārūdamūrti are a few such. Being an epic hero, as presented in the Kumārasambhava of Kalidāsa, some of his forms are related to the birth of Kumāra also. In Tamil folk tales and dramas Muruga is a dynamic figure. Especially the episode connected with Valli is a theme of folk interest as frequently dramatised in country theatres. So some of the forms are on the subject of Muruga's love-making with Valli. Similarly the anecdote connected with Avvaiyār, the Tamil poetess of repute, to whom Muruga is said to have offered jujube in the guise of a cowboy, is a popular one. Though these are not canonified forms, their portrayal in temple cars points out the value attached by artists to the regional variations of Kumāra mythology and folk taste.
To begin with, Muruga was a Tamil God 222 as he appears in Cankam literature. In the course of time the Muruga cult got mixed up with the Kumāra cult of North India. So in iconography the two sided personality of Kumāra is brought out in the delineation of Tamil forms such as Vallikalyanasundara and Northern forms such as Kumārasambhava. The mingling of iconographical forms under a common Muruga-Kumāra cult indicates the pan-Indian trends in cultural evolution which through the ages had developed, setting aside narrow territorial bias and linguistic barriers. Thus iconography through the ages had served as a medium for the spirit of cultural oneness and historical identity, contributing the needed incentives for North-South unity in the process of India's ‘tryst' with ‘destiny'.
Prof. Raju Kalidos
|
Dr. Raju Kalidos is Dean of the Arts Faculty and Head of the Department of Sculpture and Art History at the Tamil University, Tanjavur. He has published more than sixty articles on Indian iconography in distinguished academic journals of Europe and India. He has published and lectured extensively on topics of Indian sculpture, architecture and iconography and was voted 'Man of the Year 1997' by the American Biographical Institute.